Clinical note
Interobserver, Intraobserver and Intrapatient Reliability Scores of Myocardial Strain Imaging with 2-D Echocardiography in Patients Treated with Anthracyclines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Myocardial strain imaging with 2-D echocardiography is a relatively new noninvasive method to assess myocardial deformation. To determine the interobserver, intraobserver and intrapatient reliability scores, we evaluated myocardial strain measurements of 10 asymptomatic survivors of childhood cancer. Ten patients were selected randomly out of a follow-up cohort of childhood cancer survivors. All 10 patients underwent a transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Two-dimensional gray scale images were made in parasternal apical four-chamber, apical two-chamber, midcavity short-axis and basal short-axis views. Offline analysis was performed using software for echocardiographic quantification (Echopac 6.1.0, GE Medical Systems, Horten, Norway). All echocardiographic studies were analyzed offline by three observers, separately (A.M., G.W., M.P.). A custom-made software package was designed for averaging the strain curves of three consecutive cardiac cycles. Values of peak systolic strain, time-to-peak strain and time-to-end systole of the different segments of the left ventricle were used for statistical analysis. Interobserver, intraobserver and intrapatient reliability were expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Interobserver ICCs of peak strain, time to peak strain and time to aortic valve closure (AVC) were generally good to very good in all views and segments, except for in the two-chamber view. Intraobserver ICCs were rated as very good for almost all segments, except for the longitudinal peak strain values of the two-chamber view. Intrapatient ICCs were generally good for the two-chamber, four-chamber and midcavity short-axis views, but fair to moderate for the segments of the basal short-axis view (SaxMV). We recommend use of the four-chamber view for longitudinal peak strain values, and the basal and midcavity short-axis views for radial and circumferential peak strain values. Furthermore, we strongly recommend using the average of three cardiac cycles for peak strain values in clinical studies. (E-mail: [email protected])

Introduction

Myocardial strain imaging with 2-D echocardiography is a relatively new noninvasive method to assess myocardial deformation (Reisner et al. 2004). It is considered to be less affected by tethering, translational artefacts and traction than Doppler measurements of myocardial velocities (Korinek et al 2005, Leitman et al 2004). Tissue movement is estimated using frame-by-frame image tracking. Ultrasound tissue images contain many small picture elements (speckles) and natural acoustic markers, which move together with the tissue and do not change their pattern significantly in the time between the successive frames. In this way, displacement of tissue can be assessed in 2-D for the whole image. Each speckle can be followed accurately during several consecutive frames. A different displacement between regions reflects deformation of the tissue by contraction or relaxation (Leitman et al. 2004). Strain is the change in size relative to its original size, i.e., the relative deformation. Regional deformation of the myocardium occurs in the three orthogonal directions: longitudinally, radially and circumferentially. Using 2-D strain imaging, two of these components can be determined, depending on the used image plane. Myocardial strain imaging is still used only in an experimental setting and has not yet gained extensive clinical use. The first studies on reproducibility of this technique have been published (Serri et al 2006, Hurlburt et al 2007, Chan et al 2006, Reant et al 2008). We are currently evaluating the use of strain rate imaging (SRI) for the early detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in a large study. To determine the interobserver, intraobserver and intrapatient reliability scores, we evaluated myocardial strain measurements of 10 asymptomatic survivors of childhood cancer.

Section snippets

Study population

Ten patients were selected randomly out of a follow-up cohort of childhood cancer survivors. The criterion for selection was a successful and complete echocardiographic study without the presence of a structural heart disease or clinical heart failure. All 10 patients were treated with anthracyclines (cumulative dose ranging from 50 to 450 mg/m2, median 160 mg/m2) more than five years before the present study. The group included five males and five females. The age of the patients ranged from

Interobserver reliability

Interobserver reliability coefficients of peak strain, time to peak strain and time to AVC were in general good to very good in all views and segments, except for the two-chamber view (Table 1). Agreement between the three observers in the two-chamber view was moderate for the longitudinal peak strain values of the segments of the anterior wall and poor for the longitudinal peak strain values of the inferior wall. ICCs of all measured parameters of the four-chamber view were good, except for

Discussion

Myocardial strain imaging using 2-D tissue tracking is a promising method for automatic wall deformation assessment. In spite of its limitations (such as its sensitivity to signal noise), it has the advantage over conventional tissue Doppler–based strain imaging that a lower frame rate is required, that the strain estimates are not angle dependent and that strain in 2-D is obtained. Myocardial strain imaging has been extensively validated with sonomicrometry (Urheim et al. 2000) and magnetic

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank Prof.dr. J. M. Thijssen for his comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. This study was supported by the Foundation of Childhood Cancer Nijmegen (“Stichting Vrienden KOC”).

Cited by (42)

  • Variability and Reproducibility of Segmental Longitudinal Strain Measurement: A Report From the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force

    2018, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    A number of studies evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver variability of segmental strain with conflicting results. Mavinkurve-Groothuis et al. (17) assessed the reproducibility of segmental strain in 1 vendor in a small number of normal volunteers and found that it was good in 4-chamber views but poor in the 2-chamber views. In the HUNT (Nord-Trøndelag Health) study, the segmental strain analysis was performed on a larger number of segments, and the results showed poor intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (11).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text