Abstract
Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) provides high-resolution transmural images of the arterial wall. By performing a pullback of the ICUS transducer and three-dimensional reconstruction of the images, an advanced assessment of the lumen and vessel wall morphology can be obtained. To reduce the analysis time and the subjectivity of boundary tracing, automated segmentation of the image sequence must be performed. The Quantitative Coronary Ultrasound – Clinical Measurement Solutions (QCU-CMS) (semi)automated analytical software package uses a combination of transversal and longitudinal model and knowledge-guided contour detection techniques. On multiple longitudinal sections through the pullback stack, the external vessel contours are detected simultaneously, allowing mutual guidance of the detection in difficult areas. Subsequently, luminal contours are detected on these longitudinal sections. Vessel and luminal contour points are transformed to the individual cross-sections, where they guide the vessel and lumen contour detection on these transversal images. The performance of the software was validated stepwise. A set of phantoms was used to determine the systematic and random errors of the contour detection of external vessel and lumen boundaries. Subsequently, the results of the contour detection as obtained in in vivo image sets were compared with expert manual tracing, and finally the contour detection in in vivo image sequences was compared with results obtained from another previously validated ICUS quantification system. The phantom lumen diameters were underestimated by 0.1 mm, equally by the QCU-CMS software and by manual tracing. Comparison of automatically detected contours and expert manual contours, showed that lumen contours correspond very well (systematic and random radius difference: −0.025 ± 0.067 mm), while automatically detected vessel contours slightly overestimated the expert manual contours (radius difference: 0.061 ± 0.037 mm). The cross-sectional vessel and lumen areas as detected with our system and with the second computerized system showed a high correlation (r = 0.995 and 0.978, respectively). Thus, use of the new QCU-CMS analytical software is feasible and the validation data suggest its application for the analysis of clinical research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basis structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree; basics of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992; 85(6): 1987–2003.
Rasheed Q, Hodgson JM. Applications of intracoronary ultrasonography in the study of coronary artery pathophysiology. J Clin Ultrasound 1993; 21: 569–578.
Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995; 92(3): 657–671.
Potkin BN, Bartorelli AL, Gessert JM, et al. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation 1990; 81: 1575–1585.
Von Birgelen C, Di Mario C, Wenguang L. Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: an in vitro and in vivo study using a novel system for the contour detection of plaque and lumen. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 516–527.
Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image Processing, analysis, and machine vision. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove: PWS Publishing, 1999.
Sonka M, Winniford MD, Collins SM. Robust simultaneous detection of coronar y borders in complex images. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1995; 14(1): 151–161.
Dijkstra J, Wahle A, Koning G, Reiber JHC, Sonka M. Quantitative coronary ultrasound: state of the art. In: Reiber JHC, Wall EEvd, editors. What's new in Cardiovascular Imaging: Developments on Cardiovascular Medicine; Vol. 207 Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998: 79–94.
Li W, von Birgelen C, HartLooper A, et al. Semi-automatic contour detection for volumetric quantification of intracoronary ultrasound. Computers in Cardiol 1994; 277–280.
Wahle A, Prause GPM, DeJong SC, Sonka M. Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography – Methods and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1999; 18(8): 686–699.
Wahle A, Prause GPM, von Birgelen C, Erbel R, Sonka M. Fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound in vivo: establishing the absolute 3-D frame orientation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46(10): 1176–1180.
Schuurbiers JCH, von Birgelen C, Wentzel JJ, et al. On the IVUS plaque volume error in coronary arteries when neglecting curvature. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26(9): 1403–1411.
Reiber J, Schiemanck L, van der Zwet P, et al. State of the art in quantitative coronary arteriography as of 1996. In: Reiber JHC, Wall EEvd editors. Cardiovascular Imaging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996; 39–56.
Brunette J, Mongrain R, Cloutier G, Bertrand M, Bertrand OF, Tardif J-C. A novel realistic three-layer phantom for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. Int J Cardiac Imag 2001; 17(5): 371–381.
von Birgelen C, de Vrey EA, Mintz GS, et al. ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: feasibility and reproducibility of the automated analysis of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in humans. Circulation 1997; 96(9): 2944–2952.
Stahr P, Rupprecht HJ, Voigtlander T, et al. Importance of calibration for diameter and area determination by intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiac Imag 1996; 12(4): 221–229.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koning, G., Dijkstra, J., von Birgelen, C. et al. Advanced contour detection for three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: a validation – in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 235–248 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015551920382
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015551920382