Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 142, Issue 2, August 2001, Pages 254-262
American Heart Journal

Acute Ischemic Heart Disease
Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.116481Get rights and content

Abstract

Background The Jeopardy Score from Duke University and the Myocardial Jeopardy Index from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) have been validated but never applied to a large unselected cohort. We assessed the prognostic value of these existing jeopardy scores, along with that of a new Lesion Score developed for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), a clinical data collection initiative capturing all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in the province of Alberta. Methods The predictive value of these three scores were compared in a cohort of >20,000 patients (9922 treated medically, 6334 treated with percutaneous intervention, and 3811 treated with bypass surgery). Scores were considered individually in logistic regression models for their ability to predict outcome and then added to models containing sociodemographic data, comorbidities, ejection fraction, indication for procedure, and descriptors of coronary anatomy. Results All scores were found to be predictive of 1-year mortality, especially when patients are treated medically or with percutaneous intervention. In these patients, the APPROACH Lesion Score performed slightly better than the other jeopardy scores. The Duke Jeopardy Score was most predictive in those patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Conclusions Myocardial jeopardy scores provide independent prognostic information for patients with ischemic heart disease, especially if those patients are treated medically or with percutaneous intervention. These scores represent potentially valuable tools in cardiovascular outcome studies. The APPROACH Lesion Score may perform slightly better than previously developed jeopardy scores. (Am Heart J 2001;142:254-61.)

Section snippets

Methods

APPROACH is a clinical data collection initiative that captures all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in the province of Alberta.9 The database contains detailed clinical information including age, sex, ejection fraction, and the presence or absence of previous myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, elevated creatinine level, renal dialysis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, liver

Results

The 3 jeopardy scores were calculated for each of the 20,067 patients. Patients were grouped according to the initial treatment strategy: medical therapy in 9922 patients, percutaneous intervention in 6334 patients, and bypass surgery in 3811 patients. Table I illustrates the baseline characteristics of each treatment subset and for the overall group.Differences among the treatment groups for the categorical baseline variables and for death at 1 year were tested with χ2 tests of independence.

Discussion

Compared with simple considerations of the number of diseased vessels, the calculation of jeopardy scores allows for the variability in importance of each of the 3 major coronary arteries in individual patients. The Duke Jeopardy Score and BARI Myocardial Jeopardy Index are very different from each other. The Duke Jeopardy Score is, arguably, the simplest score available and is therefore easy to use clinically. Despite its simplicity, it has been reported to provide significant prognostic

Acknowledgements

The APPROACH initiative was initially funded in 1995 by a grant from the Weston Foundation. The ongoing operation of the project is supported by Merck Frosst Canada Inc, Monsanto Canada Inc, Searle, Eli Lilly Canada Inc, Guidant Corporation, Boston Scientific Ltd, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, and Johnson & Johnson Inc-Cordis. We appreciate the assistance of the Calgary Regional Health Authority and the Capital Health Authority in supporting online data entry by cardiac catheterization laboratory

References (22)

  • N Oysel et al.

    Risk factors for myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass graft surgery

    Eur Heart J

    (1989)
  • Cited by (138)

    • The association between left main coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular-specific and total mortality: The Coronary Artery Calcium Consortium

      2019, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      A criticism of this scoring protocol is that it does not account for the potential differential risk associated with plaque localization within the coronary tree [8–10]. For example, the Agatston method weighs CAC in the left-main (LM) coronary artery equally to that in the distal right coronary artery (RCA), despite a vast difference in the quantity of subtended at-risk myocardium and, consequently, a faster progression from symptoms to death in patients with LM disease [11–14]. Accordingly, it has been suggested—but not convincingly demonstrated—that LM CAC in asymptomatic patients confers incremental risk beyond that predicted by its contribution to the total CAC score [15].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    APPROACH is supported by donations from a variety of industry sponsors (see full list in the Acknowledgments section). WAG is supported by a Population Health Investigator Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and by a Government of Canada Research Chair in Health Services Research.

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: M. L. Knudtson, MD, Room C-807, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th St NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9. E-mail: [email protected]

    View full text