Original Articles
Quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography in human beings: Influence of triggering mode*

https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.127453Get rights and content

Abstract

To facilitate quantitation of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in human beings, dual- or triple-triggered flash imaging has been advocated. However, the effect of this modality on quantitative blood-flow parameters of MCE is not known. Accordingly, MCE was quantitated in 71 myocardial regions of 22 patients (age: 57 ± 16 years) during continuous infusion of Optison (12-18 mL/h). Two sets of images with end-systolic gating (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:6, and 1:8) from the apical 4-chamber view were acquired: single and dual triggering for the first 15 patients; and single and triple triggering for the other 7 patients. During gated imaging, MCE of the first, second, and third frame were quantitated. Curves of intensity versus pulsing intervals were fitted to an exponential function:y = A (1-e−βt). Where β is myocardial blood velocity or the rate of rise of myocardial contrast intensity (MCI), and A is myocardial blood volume or the plateau of MCI reached. Continuous imaging, and the second and third frame in 1:1 gating only, provided similar intensity to precontrast imaging. Beyond 1:1 gating, MCI of the second frame in dual triggering mode gradually increased with incremental pulsing interval. This was still present but less pronounced in triple triggering. During dual and triple triggering, a lower β was observed compared with single triggering. Application of image subtraction with the flash procedure further decreased β, A, and the A*β product, a quantitative parameter of blood flow by MCE. Thus, flash subtraction imaging alters the quantitative parameters of myocardial blood velocity and flow derived from MCE. Continuous imaging, and the second or third frame in flash imaging at 1:1 gating only, result in MCI similar to precontrast imaging and can be used for background subtraction to quantitate MCE parameters. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1432-9.)

Section snippets

Study population

The study population consisted of 22 patients (16 men, mean age 58 ± 15 years) with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Thirteen patients had a prior myocardial infarction. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Baylor College of Medicine. All patients gave written informed consent to the study protocol. Patients were not eligible for the study if they met any of the following criteria: (1) known or suspected hypersensitivity to blood, blood products, or albumin,

Effect of continuous imaging and triggering mode on contrast intensity

Fifteen patients underwent single and dual triggering and 7 patients underwent single and triple triggering. MCI could be quantitated in 53 (88%) of the 60 potential myocardial segments of the 15 patients with dual triggering, and in 18 (64%) of potential segments of the 7 patients with dual triggering. Contrast intensity replenishment curves of a patient with single and dual triggering (Figure 2) and another with single and triple triggering (Figure 3) are shown.

. Example of myocardial contrast

Discussion

There are 2 main findings of the current study investigation: (1) The flash subtraction method with dual or triple triggering significantly alters the quantitative contrast-echocardiography parameters of myocardial velocity and blood flow. This occurs even if no subtraction of intensity is performed using the flash method. (2) Continuous imaging can be used for background subtraction because it destroys enough microbubbles for MCI to be similar to precontrast imaging. A second-best approach for

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Ms Hema P. Ramnauth and Ms Linda Pander for their expert secretarial help in preparing the manuscript and graphs.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

*

Reprint requests: William A. Zoghbi, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, SM-677, Houston, TX 77030 (E-mail: [email protected]).

View full text