Interhospital observer agreement in interpretation of exercise myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT studies

https://doi.org/10.1067/mnc.2001.110388Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. We sought to determine the degree of interhospital agreement in the interpretation of exercise myocardial technetium-99m tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Methods and Results. Five experienced hospital laboratories were asked to submit 2 sets of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images obtained in 150 patients undergoing coronary angiography: group A used a uniform color scale for all hospitals, and group B used the individual color scale in place at each hospital (uniform color scale, nonuniform color scale, and black-and-white scale). Thus a total of 300 images were interpreted by each center without knowledge of any other patient data. Angiographically significant coronary artery disease (≤50% diameter stenosis) was present in 90 patients (60%). By a majority decision (3 or more centers), the sensitivity was found to be similar for groups A and B (82% and 84%, respectively), but the specificity was significantly higher for group A (87% vs 73%; P = .021). Four or all 5 of the centers agreed on abnormal or normal results of SPECT images in 87% of patients in group A (κ 0.626) and in 78% of patients in group B (κ 0.528). The κ value of 0.617 was obtained for the uniform color scale, 0.467 for the uniform black-and-white scale, and 0.444 for the nonuniform color scale. Agreement on the left anterior descending artery territory (81% for group A and 78% for group B) was similar to that of the right coronary artery territory (79% for A and 75% for B) and to that of the left circumflex artery territory (91% for A and 85% for B). Agreement was similar in patients with 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease (91%, 88%, and 86% for group A and 81%, 82%, and 82% for group B, respectively).

Conclusions. In the interpretation of myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT images, good interinstitutional observer agreement was found, mainly when the uniform display method was adopted.

References (0)

Cited by (18)

  • Normal myocardial perfusion SPECT database for the Spanish population

    2010, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nakajima et al17 encontraron diferencias significativas al comparar mediante SPECT de perfusión miocárdica una población japonesa con baja probabilidad de cardiopatía isquémica y la población norteamericana normal del programa del Cedars Sinai Medical Center. De la misma manera que una unidad de imagen debe conocer su propia variabilidad interobservador e interensayo de las diferentes técnicas que utiliza18–20, sería recomendable que dispusiera de una base de datos de normalidad propia con la que comparar los resultados obtenidos en su medio. En nuestro estudio se ha obtenido una base de datos de normalidad de estudios de SPECT de perfusión miocárdica con voluntarios sanos españoles utilizando el programa 4DM-SPECT.

  • Diagnostic impact of SPECT image display on assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease

    2007, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Consistent with our study findings, prior investigations have reported that interpretation of SPECT perfusion images can vary according to image display used. In a multicenter study in which SPECT images were interpreted via both standardized and institution-specific display formats, Candell-Riera et al8 reported that diagnostic specificity for exclusion of angiography-evidenced CAD was improved with the use of a standardized image display as compared with variable displays used at participating institutions. Similarly, in the Multicenter Study on Silent Myocardial Ischemia,19 a trial incorporating 556 planar Tl-201 studies from participating sites using different display formats, abnormality rates were higher at local participating sites as compared with a core laboratory that interpreted images using a standardized gray display format.

  • Nuclear cardiology, an evidence based sub-speciality

    2006, Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text