Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the Use of Optical Flow Methods with Spin-Tagging Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a versatile noninvasive tool for achieving full-field quantitative visualization of biomedical fluid flows. In this study, two MRI velocimetry techniques (spin tagging and phase contrast) are used to obtain velocity measurements in a Poiseuille flow for Reynolds numbers below 1000. Spin-tagging MRI velocimetry supplies the displacement of tagged grids of nuclear spins from which the velocity field can be inferred, while phase contrast MRI velocimetry directly provides velocity data for every pixel in the field of view. Although the phase contrast method is more accurate for this flow, this technique is more sensitive to errors from magnetic susceptibility gradients, higher order motions, and has limited dynamic range. Spin-tagging MRI velocimetry is a viable alternative if automatic methods for extracting velocity fields from the tags can be found. Optical flow, a technique originally developed for machine vision applications, is proposed here as a postprocessing step to obtain two-dimensional velocity fields from spin-tagging MRI images. Results with artificially generated grids demonstrate the robustness of the optical flow algorithm to noise and indicate that a 7%–10% average error can be expected from the optical flow calculations alone, independent of MRI image artifacts. Experiments on spin-tagging MRI images for a Re=230 Poiseuille flow gave an average error of 6.41%, which was consistent with the measurement error of the generated (synthetic) images with the same level of random noise superimposed. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8761-c, 8719Uv, 8757Ce

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bakker, C. J. G., R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and M. Fuderer. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11:539–548, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barron, J. L., D. J. Fleet, and S. S. Beauchemin. Performance of optical flow techniques. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 12:43–77, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bittoun, J., E. Bourroul, O. Jolivet, I. Idy-Peretti, E. Mousseaux, A. Tardivon, and P. Peronneau. High-precision MR velocity mapping by 3D-Fourier phase encoding with a small number of encoding steps. Magn. Reson. Med. 29:674–680, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black, M. J., and P. Anandan. The robust estimation of mul-iple motions: Parametric and piece-wise smooth flow fields. Comput. Visi. Image Understanding 63:75–104, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Browne, P., A. Ramuzat, R. Saxena, and A. P. Yoganathan. Experimental investigation of the steady flow downstream of the St. Jude bileaflet heart valve: A comparison between LDV and PIV techniques. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28:39–47, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callaghan, P. T. Principles of NMR Microscopy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caprihan, A., and E. Fukushima. Flow measurements by NMR. Phys. Rep. 198:196–235, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duerk, J. L., O. P. Simonetti, G. C. Hurst, and D. A. Finelli. Experimental conformation of phase encoding of instantaneous derivatives of position. Magn. Reson. Med. 32:77–87, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feinauer, A., S. A. Altobelli, and E. Fukushima. NMR measurements of flow profiles in a coarse bed of packed spheres. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10:479–487, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frayne, R., and B. K. Rutt. Understanding acceleration-induced displacement artifacts in phase-contrast MR velocity measurements. J. Magn. Resonan. Imaging 5:207–217, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hill, R. B., and J. C. Klewicki. Data reduction methods for flow tagging velocity measurements. Exp. Fluids 20:863–871, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hitt, D., M. L. Lowe, and R. Newcomer. Application of optical flow techniques to flow velocimetry. Phys. Fluids 7:6–8, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jou, L.-D., R. van Tyen, S. A. Berger, and D. Saloner. Calculation of the magnetization distribution for fluid flow in curved vessels. Magn. Reson. Med. 35:577–584, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, S. S., T. P. Graham, and C. H. Lorenz. Noninvasive delineation of normal right ventricular contractile motion with magnetic resonance imaging myocardial tagging. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:756–763, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kutsovsky, Y. E., L. E. Scriven, and H. T. Davis. NMR imaging of velocity profiles and velocity distributions in bead packs. Phys. Fluids 8:863–871, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kutter, E. MRI velocimetry in filtration flows: Time-of-flight vs. phase encoding methods, MS thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.

  17. McVeigh, E. R. MRI of myocardial function: motion tracking techniques. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14:137–150, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris, P. G. NMR Imaging in Medicine and Biology. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moser, K. W., J. G. Georgiadis, and R. O. Buckius. On the accuracy of EPI-based phase contrast velocimetry. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18:1115–1123, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moser, K. W., E. C. Kutter, J. G. Georgiadis, and R. O. Buckius. Velocity measurements of flow through a step stenosis using magnetic resonance imaging. Exp. Fluids 29:438–447, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moser, K. W., L. G. Raguin, A. Harris, H. D. Morris, J. G. Georgiadis, M. Shannon, and M. Philpott. Visualization of Taylor-Couette and spiral Poiseuille flows using a snapshot FLASH spatial tagging sequence. Magn. Reson. Imaging 18:199–207, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mosher, T. J., and M. B. Smith. A DANTE tagging sequence for the evaluation of translational sample motion. Magn. Reson. Med. 15:334–339, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oshinski, M. S., D. N. Ku, D. E. Bohning, and R. I. Pettigrew. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2:665–670, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pelc, N. J., M. A. Bernstein, A. Shimakawa, and G. H. Glover. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1:405–413, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shattuck, M., J. G. Behringer, G. A. Johnson, and J. G. Georgiadis. Convection and flow in porous media, I: Visual-ization by magnetic resonance imaging. J. Fluid Mech. 332:215–245, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stuber, M., S. E. Fischer, M. B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger. Towards high resolution myocardial tagging. Magn. Reson. Med. 41:639–643, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Su, M.-Y., and O. Nalcioglu. Susceptibility effects in porous media in the presence of flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3:794–799, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, K.W., Georgiadis, J.G. & Buckius, R.O. On the Use of Optical Flow Methods with Spin-Tagging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 9–17 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1332082

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1332082

Navigation