Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Cardiovascular Intervention
Comparison by Optical Coherence Tomography of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Implanted in One Coronary Artery in One Procedure
– 6-Month Follow-up –
Naoki MiyoshiJunya ShiteToshiro ShinkeHiromasa OtakeYusuke TaninoDaisuke OgasawaraTakahiro SawadaHiroyuki KawamoriHiroki KatoNaoki YoshinoAmane KozukiKen-ichi Hirata
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2010 Volume 74 Issue 5 Pages 903-908

Details
Abstract

Background: Differences between paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in neointimal proliferation under strictly matched conditions remain to be clarified by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods and Results: Between May and December 2007, 27 patients were implanted with a PES and a SES, randomized to either the proximal or distal site in a single coronary artery, and underwent follow-up angiography and OCT examination at 6 months. The frequency of vessel wall apposition with neointima was greater for PES than for SES (92.6% vs 85.8%, P<0.01). The median (25th, 75th percentiles) neointimal thickness (NIT) in PES was significantly greater than that in SES (90 μm [25th: 40 μm; 75th: 200 μm] vs 50 μm [25th: 20 μm; 75th: 140 μm]; P<0.01). Both the average difference between the maximum and minimum NIT in each cross-section and the average difference between the maximum and minimum NIT in the longitudinal axis were larger in PES than in SES (206±88 vs 131±57 μm; P<0.001, 607±243 vs 400±185 μm; P<0.001). Low-density spots were significantly more frequently observed in PES than in SES (30.9% vs 17.0%, P=0.001). Conclusions: Compared with SES, PES had a non-uniform and larger neointimal thickness with fewer uncovered struts, and more peri-strut low-density areas. (Circ J 2010; 74: 903 - 908)

Content from these authors
© 2010 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top