Elsevier

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volume 70, Issue 1, February 1995, Pages 50-54
Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Subspecialty Clinics: Cardiology
Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Patient Knowledge of Endocarditis Prophylaxis

https://doi.org/10.4065/70.1.50Get rights and content

Objective

To determine whether adults with congenital heart disease have adequate knowledge of infective endocarditis and endocarditis prophylaxis and to ascertain whether an educational program effectively improves patient knowledge and compliance.

Material and Methods

We asked 102 consecutive patients to complete a 12-question survey to assess their knowledge of heart disease, infective endocarditis, and endocarditis prophylaxis.

Results

Of 102 patients, 100 (98%) completed the questionnaire. Sixty-eight patients knew the name of their heart disease. Fifty patients correctly defined endocarditis, but only 43 knew hygiene measures that could prevent endocarditis. Ninety-six patients knew that they needed to take “a medicine” before dental procedures, and 76 of those patients (79%) knew that an antibiotic was necessary. Patient use of cardiac medications and a history of endocarditis correlated significantly with knowledge of endocarditis. Patients who had been to the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Clinic at least once knew endocarditis prevention measures and the importance of regular dental and cardiology follow-up significantly more frequently than did first-time attendees. Despite educational counseling, however, patient recall of endocarditis and its prevention is disappointing.

Conclusion

Many adults with congenital heart disease have inadequate knowledge of their cardiac lesion, endocarditis, and endocarditis prophylaxis. Educational efforts for adults with congenital heart disease need to be updated and reinforced regularly.

Section snippets

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between May and August 1993, 102 consecutive patients who attended the Mayo Clinic ACHDC were asked to complete a 12-question survey (Table 1) about knowledge of their heart disease, medications, infective endocarditis, and endocarditis prophylaxis. All patients who came to the clinic during that period were eligible for study participation. Patients completed the questionnaire while waiting for their ACHDC appointment; they were unsupervised at that time. No patient had previously received

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients, 100 (58 female and 42 male [98%]) returned completed questionnaires. The ages of the participants ranged from 16 to 71 years; the mean age was 35.9 ± 13.3. Ninety-three patients were high school graduates.

Sixty-eight patients knew the correct name of their cardiac disease. The cardiac lesions of our study patients are listed in Table 3. Of the 59 patients who were taking cardiac medications, 58 (98%) knew the correct name (or names) of their medication. Of the 76 patients

DISCUSSION

In 1955, the American Heart Association Committee on Prevention of Rheumatic Fever and Bacterial Endocarditis published prophylaxis recommendations for bacterial endocarditis.9 These recommendations were revised most recently in 1990.10 Since 1955, the American Heart Association has conducted an extensive awareness campaign, including the distribution of literature and wallet-sized cards to patients with congenital heart disease at risk for infective endocarditis.

Despite such extensive

CONCLUSION

Adults with congenital heart disease have inadequate knowledge of infective endocarditis and endocarditis prophylaxis. Clearly, educational efforts are helpful, but patient recall is still disappointing. Health professionals who are responsible for the care of adults with congenital heart disease need to reinforce established information about endocarditis and simple preventive hygiene measures. At each clinic visit, literature should be provided to and reviewed with all adult patients with

REFERENCES (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (66)

  • Cardiac catheterization laboratory and the role in effective patient education: A model approach

    2021, Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Patients with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) and their families usually have a basic understanding of cardiac anatomy and an overall idea of the potential interventions [3,4]. Due to their disease complexity, many physicians use drawings or analogies to explain their cardiac condition, giving patients an adequate understanding of their condition but often not enough to facilitate discussions of therapeutic alternatives or provoke inciteful questions before high-risk interventions [5–8]. Based on recognized challenges surrounding patient education, studies have shown how 3D printed models (3DPM) improve patients' and families' understanding due to a more efficient exchange of information, more interactive, and fairer communication process overall.

  • Are adults with congenital heart disease informed about their risk for infective endocarditis and treated in accordance to current guidelines?

    2017, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The terms endocarditis and antibiotic prophylaxis were known to only 16% and 22% of patients, respectively; and only 58% could name at least one situation that carries a risk of infection [13]. In a study from the Mayo clinic, only around 50% of the patients (n = 100) correctly defined endocarditis and knew hygiene measures that could prevent it [14]. In a more recent Belgian study, 62 ACHD patients completed a questionnaire about their knowledge regarding their CHD [15].

  • INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS

    2009, Feigin and Cherry's Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Sixth Edition
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text