Differential clinical prognostic classifications in dilated and ischemic advanced heart failure: the EPICAL study

Am Heart J. 2000 May;139(5):895-904. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90023-1.

Abstract

Background: The clinical management of severe congestive heart failure (CHF) should be graded according to the prognosis of each individual patient. Our objective was to elaborate a prognostic rating system for severe CHF.

Methods: The EPICAL program (Epidémiologie de l'Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancée en Lorraine) identified patients with severe CHF defined by hospitalization accompanied by class III/IV dyspnea, edema, or hypertension; an ejection fraction </=30% or a cardiothoracic index >/=60%. Baseline variables were tested in Cox multivariate models.

Results: Patients with ischemic heart disease (n = 219) had a lower 1-year survival rate (57.6%) than patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 182) (69. 1%). Multivariate analysis identified 5 prognostic factors for ischemic CHF and 7 for CHF caused by dilated cardiomyopathy. These variables were used to classify patients within prognostic subgroups of good (>75%), intermediate, or poor (</=25%) 1-year survival.

Conclusion: A score for prognostic prediction was further derived from readily available data to help physicians improve decision making and to assist in clinical trials as a stratification tool.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / classification
  • Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / diagnosis*
  • Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / mortality
  • Female
  • France
  • Heart Failure / classification
  • Heart Failure / diagnosis*
  • Heart Failure / mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Myocardial Ischemia / classification
  • Myocardial Ischemia / diagnosis*
  • Myocardial Ischemia / mortality
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Analysis