Background: Migrants from the Indian subcontinent (South Asian migrants) in the United Kingdom have high mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in comparison to the indigenous population. Few studies have assessed the prevalence of CHD in South Asians, and the applicability of conventional survey methods in this population is not known. In this pilot random population survey of South Asian men and women living in West London, the prevalence of CHD as judged by the Rose questionnaire, past cardiac history, cardiologist and resting electrocardiogram were compared.
Methods: Subjects aged 30-64 years from randomly selected households were invited for a cardiological assessment. A lay person administered the Rose questionnaire and recorded the past cardiac history. A cardiologist also made an independent assessment and a 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded and analysed according to the Minnesota code.
Results: Three hundred and seventy-six individuals (192 men and 184 women) were assessed. The prevalence of angina in men and women, respectively, was 3.1% and 4.9% by the Rose questionnaire; 2.6% and 2.2% by past cardiac history; and 4.2% and 0.5% according to the cardiologist. The prevalence of myocardial infarction in men and women, respectively, was 5.2% and 2.2% by the Rose questionnaire, 3.6% and zero by past cardiac history and 3.6% and 0.5% by the cardiologist. Q/QS codes were present in 1.6% men and 0.5% women and ischaemic codes in 13% men and 14% women. Ischaemic changes were not associated with any cardiac history in 72% of men and 92% of women. For a diagnosis of CHD in men, there was poor agreement between the Rose questionnaire and either the past cardiac history or the cardiologist's assessment, but moderate agreement between the past cardiac history and the cardiologist. Agreement was poor between all three methods for a positive diagnosis of CHD in women.
Conclusion: Current accepted epidemiological methods for assessing CHD prevalence may be inaccurate in South Asians, especially women. Electrocardiogram abnormalities suggestive of ischaemia are common in South Asians and are usually not associated with evidence of CHD. Thus, their value as indicators of CHD is questionable.