Short deceleration time of mitral inflow E velocity: prognostic implication with atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998 May;11(5):450-7. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(98)70025-2.

Abstract

The present study retrospectively identified 367 patients who had restrictive physiology as defined by deceleration time < or = 130 msec; 293 were in sinus rhythm (SR) (194 men and 99 women; mean age 64 +/- 14 years) and 74 were in atrial fibrillation (AF) (51 men and 23 women; mean age 72 +/- 11 years; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar underlying diagnoses and no significant difference in Doppler indices (E wave, 96 +/- 23 vs 99 +/- 22 cm/sec in SR and AF, respectively; deceleration time, 116 +/- 12 vs 116 +/- 13 msec; and left ventricular outflow tract time velocity integral, 14.8 +/- 4.8 vs 14.5 +/- 4.4 cm). Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in SR patients (29% +/- 16% vs 39% +/- 20%; p = 0.0003). There were 120 deaths (41%) in the SR group and 35 (47%) in the AF group (median follow-up for both groups, 2.2 years). Restrictive physiology as defined by Doppler echocardiography (deceleration time < or = 130 msec) appears to predict a similar poor prognosis with AF as with SR.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnostic imaging*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / epidemiology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology
  • Blood Flow Velocity / physiology
  • Coronary Circulation / physiology
  • Diastole / physiology*
  • Echocardiography*
  • Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve / diagnostic imaging*
  • Mitral Valve / physiopathology
  • Prognosis
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume / physiology
  • Survival Rate