The role of enteroviral myocardial infection in the development of dilated cardiomyopathy could only be substantiated after the introduction of molecular biological techniques (polymerase chain reaction, in-situ hybridization) in virological diagnostics of dilated cardiomyopathy. By using histological and especially immunohistological techniques for the detection of myocardial inflammation in patients with the tentative clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy, a differentiation between inflammatory cardiomyopathy and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy on the basis of the WHO classification 1995 (31) was made. Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is defined by myocarditis in association with cardiac dysfunction and is diagnosed by established histological and especially immunohistological techniques. The combination of histological, immunohistological, and molecularbiological techniques enabled a subgroup analysis of the incidence of enteroviral myocardial RNA in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy in comparison to patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The study involved a total of 75 patients with impaired left ventricular function (EF < 50%) and the tentative clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. Right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies were obtained from all patients for further clarification of the cause of left ventricular functional disorder. All biopsies were analyzed for the presence of acute and chronic inflammatory myocardial alterations by histological ("Dallas" criteria) and immunohistological techniques (lymphocytic infiltrates, MHC antigen expression). Furthermore, each biopsy was examined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in combination with Southern blot hybridization for the presence of enteroviral RNA. Active myocarditis was excluded in all patients by histological examination according to the "Dallas" criteria. Using immunohistological techniques, 26/75 patients (35%) had evidence for chronic inflammatory myocardial alterations in the sense of lymphocytic infiltrates (> or = 2,0 CD3 T-lymphocytes/ visual field at 400 magnification (HPF); > or = 7 CD3 T-lymphocytes/mm2). These patients were diagnosed as having inflammatory cardiomyopathy. To differentiate between patients with and without myocardial inflammation, cases with focal cellular infiltration and an average cell number between 2.5 and 2.0 CD3 T-lymphocytes/HPF and an increased expression of additional immune markers, i.e., MHC antigens, were not addressed in the group of patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy. This is in contrast to Kühl et al (19). Consequently these patients were classified as patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. These criteria of diagnosing myocardial inflammation were based on published results (20, 23, 26, 27, 49) and on our own control group (n = 85) (19) in which mean CD3 T-lymphocyte count/HPF in normal myocardial tissue were 0.7 (range 0.0-1.4). In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed of patients with a CD3 T-lymphocyte count > or = 3 CD3 T-lymphocytes/HPF (> or + 11 CD3 T-lymphocytes/mm2). The other 49/75 patients without myocardial inflammation (< 2.0 CD3 T-lymphocytes /HPF) were diagnosed as having idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In 27/75 patients (36%), RT-PCR in combination with Southern blot hybridization revealed enteroviral RNA in the endomyocardial biopsies. The detection rate of enteroviral RNA did not differ between inflammatory cardiomyopathy (8/26 (31%)) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (19/49 39%)). In the subgroups of patients with a CD3 T-lymphocyte cell count > or = 3 CD3 T-lymphocytes/HPF (> or = 11 CD3 T-lymphocytes/mm2) (mean 4.4 +/-2.1 CD3 T-lymphocytes/HPF), three of the ten patients were enteroviral RNA positive (30%). In summary, the introduction of histological and immunohistological techniques in the extended diagnostics of dilated cardiomyopathy enables a subgroup analysis of the incidence of enteroviral myocardial RNA in